The DPDP Rules, 2025: A Bold Yet Unfinished Framework for India’s Privacy Future

The Digital Personal Data Protection (DPDP) Rules, 2025, under the Digital Personal Data Protection Act, 2023, is a significant and transformative step in India’s data protection journey. As India moves to align itself with global privacy standards while addressing local challenges, these draft rules promise innovation but also reveal areas needing refinement.

In this article, I have tried to provide an overview of the current rules along with areas of gaps identified and a brief comparison with the globally referred to standard for Privacy – GDPR.

So, let’s begin with the Overview of the DPDP Rules!

The rules showcase that at the heart of it lies a vision to protect personal data, empower individuals, and establish accountability for entities handling such data. Some of the standout provisions include:

1. Simplified Consent Management: The introduction of Consent Managers ensures that individuals (Data Principals) can seamlessly grant, manage, and withdraw consent where Consent forms must be clear and standalone, ensuring accessibility and transparency. This centralized framework brings much-needed clarity and accessibility to consent processes.
   
2. Expanded Rights for Data Principals: Individuals now have the right to access, correct, erase, and port their personal data. They are also entitled to receive breach notifications, empowering them to stay informed and in control.
   
3. Precise Data Retention Policies: The rules mandate data minimization, requiring data fiduciaries to delete inactive data after specified timelines, such as three years for e-commerce platforms. While precise, these timelines may need flexibility for sectoral variations.
   
4. Algorithmic Accountability: Recognizing the growing role of AI, the rules require Significant Data Fiduciaries (SDFs) to conduct Data Protection Impact Assessments (DPIAs) and audit algorithms for potential risks to individuals’ rights. By addressing risks from AI and automated systems, the rules take a proactive approach to addressing these risks.
   
5. Child Data Protection: Verifiable parental consent is now required to process children’s data, leveraging tools like Digital Locker services. The rules also prohibit tracking and targeted advertising, prioritizing the safety of young users – a forward-thinking measure tailored to India’s digital ecosystem.
   
6. Stricter Data Localization and Cross-Border Data Transfer Rules: The rules enforce stricter limitations on cross-border data transfers, adding a requirement of government approval for transferring critical personal data outside India. Compared to GDPR’s adequacy decisions and Standard Contractual Clauses (SCCs), this move reflects India’s emphasis on sovereignty and local economic growth.
   
7. Transparency in Government Data Processing: In a rare and uncommon feature compared to the global regulations, the privacy rules hold government and private entities equally accountable for their data practices. Thereby also ensuring that public services and subsidies are managed transparently.
   
8. The Digital-First Data Protection Board (DPB): A digital-first DPB has been introduced, who will handle complaints, enforce compliance, and impose penalties. The DPB’s digital operations align with India’s broader e-governance goals.
   
9. Proactive Breach Notifications: Data Fiduciaries are mandated to notify affected Data Principals and the Data Protection Board (DPB) within 72 hours of a breach. The rules also mandate that the notifications must be detailed describing the breach’s nature, impact, and mitigation steps implemented by the fiduciary.
   
10. Obligations for Data Fiduciaries: Data Fiduciaries are now required to implement stringent security measures, including encryption and regular audits, and to promptly report breaches, ensuring robust data protection.
    
11. Stringent Penalties for Non-Compliance: The rules propose imposing fines of up to ₹250 crore for severe violations, signalling a strong stance on enforcement. Tiered penalties based on breach severity improves the fairness and clarity aspect.
    
12. Defined Grievance Redress Mechanisms: The rules mandate the appointing of Grievance Redress Officers whose primary role will be to address complaints within a defined timeframe.

Now that we have understood the rules with much more clarity, it is safe to say that these provisions are setting the stage for India to adopt a modern, privacy-centric framework. However, the DPDP Rules, leave a huge room for improvement especially with respect to the challenges of balancing innovation, enforcement, and practicality.

Every visionary framework needs fine-tuning to truly deliver on its promises. So here are some of the gaps identified and my recommendations for a Stronger Framework inspired by industry insights and global practices!

1. Adding Clear and Binding Timelines
   • Gap: There are no clear timelines for critical processes like grievance redressal and consent withdrawal, leaving compliance open to interpretation.
   • Recommendation: Establish specific timelines, such as resolving grievances to build trust and ensure accountability.
   
2. Standardizing Security Measures
   • Gap: The rules emphasize robust security measures but don’t specify any standard/frameworks or controls that organizations can take reference from.
   • Recommendation: Reference globally recognized frameworks like ISO 27001 or add specific controls like mandating encryption for sensitive data and requiring regular vulnerability assessments to ensure consistency across industries.
   
3. Strengthen Child Data Protection Mechanisms
   • Gap: Digital Locker services for verifying parental consent are innovative but may not be accessible to everyone.
   • Recommendation: Include additional verification methods, such as government-issued IDs or secure tokens, and mandate periodic audits specific to child-related data practices to enhance accessibility and protection.
   
4. Refine Cross-Border Data Transfer Guidelines
   • Gap: The current approach to cross-border transfers, which mandates government approval for critical data, feels rigid and conflicts with the need for agility in global operations.
   • Recommendation: Define adequacy criteria, introduce Standard Contractual Clauses (SCCs), and establish a whitelist of approved jurisdictions to strike a balance between data sovereignty and global interoperability.
   
5. Promote Transparency Through Reporting
   • Gap: Transparency requirements for Significant Data Fiduciaries are not clearly defined.
   • Recommendation: Mandate annual transparency reports that detail data processing activities, compliance measures, and breach statistics to set a higher standard for accountability.
   
6. Clarify Algorithmic Decision-Making
   • Gap: The requirement for algorithm audits is a step forward, but the operational specifics remain unclear.
   • Recommendation: Add requirements for transparency in automated decision-making, provide clear explanations for outcomes, and include safeguards to prevent algorithmic bias to ensure fairness.
   
7. Balance of Requirements With Practicality
   • Gap: Rules like restricting cross-border transfers without adequate local infrastructure and the requirement to retain logs and personal data for one year to detect, investigate, and remediate unauthorized access could strain the infrastructure of smaller organizations or those without adequate resources and stifle innovation.
   • Recommendation: Allow transfers to trusted jurisdictions with strong safeguards to balance security with the need for global competitiveness. Also provide clear guidelines on the type of logs to be stored and encourage scalable, cost-effective solutions such as cloud-based storage.

These enhancements will not only address the ambiguities in the draft rules but also bring the framework closer to aligning with global privacy regulations. So, my next step is to understand how the DPDP Rules measure up against established frameworks like GDPR, let’s take a closer look at their strengths and areas that need improvement, shall we?

Looking Ahead: Will the DPDP Rules Fulfil Their Promise?

As we compare the DPDP Rules, 2025, with global benchmarks like GDPR, it becomes evident that India has taken a bold stride in shaping a privacy-centric framework tailored to its unique needs. The strengths are undeniable with introducing innovative concepts such as consent management, algorithmic accountability, and a focus on both private and public sector transparency. Yet, the framework also faces challenges, from rigid cross-border data transfer rules to the need for operational clarity.

The road ahead is very critical. Addressing these gaps through thoughtful refinement and pragmatic implementation will determine the framework’s success. If India can strike the right balance between fostering innovation, safeguarding privacy, and ensuring global interoperability, the DPDP Rules have the potential to position the country as a trusted leader in the global data economy.

The question now is whether these rules can rise to the occasion, setting a new gold standard for data governance, or whether enforcement and operational challenges will hinder their promise.

Enjoyed reading this blog? Stay updated with our latest exclusive content by following us on Twitter and LinkedIn.